LED Lights compared to neon signs

LED Lights compared to neon signs

When you are comparing LED lights and neon signs there are many factors to take into consideration. Some neon sign effects may be costly to replicate with an LED sign. Or perhaps you want a more vintage feel that would be difficult to recreate with an LED. LED Lights compared to neon signs is a common consideration for businesses. However, if you are simply looking for an effective, eye-catching way to draw attention to your business or event, LED signs will give you more versatility and a longer lifespan that neon signs. LED lights are available in a wider color range and can be programed to change color and light levels through digital controllers. Because the color of a neon sign relies on colored glass, each glass element can only be one color. LEDs are also virtually maintenance free. They have a 17-year lifespan while neon signs typically last from 8 to 15 years and usually require maintenance during that time.

LED Lights compared to neon signs considerations

Energy Savings

Neon lights consume significantly more energy than LEDs while producing the same amount of light output. One study found that while an LED consumed 8 KW, a neon sign consumed 100 KW. The cost of lighting that neon sign for a year is $43.80. The LED, on the other hand, will only cost $3.50 to light for a year.

Safety of LED lights vs. Neon

Safety, especially in high traffic areas, is a major concern for light signs. Neon lights typically run on high voltage and can be dangerous when they are in areas where they could be touched. Neon lights also use fragile glass tubes that can easily be broken by an external shock. LEDs, on the other hand, use a lower voltage level, making them much safer. They use solid-state technology and are more resistant to breakage. LED lights produce virtually no heat, and there is little to no risk of burns or fire hazards.